What should the FIFA presidency be, and who should lead it if Gianni Infantino loses battle to stay in charge?

Reimagining the FIFA Presidency: Core Responsibilities and Leadership Prospects

The FIFA presidency has historically combined vast authority, commercial ambitions and political maneuvering. In light of Gianni Infantino’s controversial bid to privatize World Cup stakes—and the growing calls for accountability—the role must be redefined. A new president should champion transparent governance, prioritize the sport’s integrity and ensure long-term growth at all levels.

Implementing Effective Checks and Balances

Unchecked power has fueled scandals under past FIFA presidents. To prevent repeat abuses:

  • Require dual approval for major initiatives. Any structural reform—whether financial, commercial or regulatory—must secure backing from both the 211 member associations and the FIFA Council.
  • Strengthen oversight bodies. Independent audit and ethics committees should have the authority to review presidential decisions in real time.
  • Enforce term limits. Limiting the number of consecutive terms ensures regular leadership renewal and deters power consolidation.

Prioritizing Sporting Merit Over Power Politics

FIFA’s core mission should focus on football development, not personal or financial gain:

  • Reevaluate World Cup formats. The proven 32-team model for men’s and women’s tournaments strikes the right balance between inclusivity and competitive quality. Any expansion must be driven by sporting logic, not electoral calculations.
  • Standardize competition protocols. Rules on hydration breaks, halftime entertainment and match scheduling should be established through transparent consultation with players, coaches and broadcasters.
  • Protect player welfare. Medical guidelines, travel logistics and rest periods must be set by independent experts rather than political appointees.

Encouraging Responsible Investment

FIFA’s revenue streams are vital for global football development. Future presidents should:

  • Reject privatization schemes that undermine member associations. Private equity should not dictate FIFA’s core competitions or governance.
  • Leverage existing reserves. FIFA’s financial strength can fund infrastructure, youth programs and development grants without selling equity in the World Cup.
  • Maximize traditional commercial partnerships. Sponsorships and broadcast rights remain the most effective way to generate sustainable funding—especially if reinvested in grassroots football.

Elevating Women’s Soccer

FIFA’s next leader must commit to equitable growth of the women’s game:

  • Create a dedicated women’s football department. Equal budgetary allocation and decision-making power will help professionalize leagues and national teams.
  • Invest in competitive calendars. Regular fixtures, youth tournaments and club championships ensure consistent development and visibility.
  • Boost commercial value. A targeted marketing and broadcast strategy for the Women’s World Cup and regional tournaments can unlock new revenue and fan engagement.

Identifying Potential Successors

Several established administrators are positioned to run for FIFA president if Infantino is unseated:

Victor Montagliani

As Concacaf president, he stabilized North American football post-2015 scandal and oversaw Canada’s co-hosting of the World Cup. Critics, however, question his handling of misconduct allegations within Canada Soccer’s women’s program.

Nasser Al-Khelaifi

Paris Saint-Germain’s chairman has widespread support in Europe and is rumored to be UEFA’s preferred candidate. Al-Khelaifi denies any formal interest in the role.

Aleksandar Čeferin

UEFA’s outspoken leader spearheaded the rejection of Infantino’s privatization plan and opposed the European Super League. He has not publicly declared a FIFA bid.

Mattias Grafström

FIFA’s current secretary general broke ranks over privatization and possesses deep institutional knowledge—qualities that could promise a smooth transition.

Luis Figo

The former Ballon d’Or winner ran a 2016 campaign on World Cup expansion. His star power and endorsements did not translate into sufficient votes, but his recent calls for Infantino’s resignation suggest renewed ambition.

Unconventional Contenders to Watch

Outside the traditional administrative circle, visionary candidates could reshape FIFA’s culture:

Lise Klaveness

The Norway Football Federation president has consistently challenged Infantino on governance and ethics. Her advocacy for transparency makes her a compelling reformer.

Pep Guardiola

One of the world’s most respected managers, Guardiola has publicly opposed fixture congestion and could bring a player-centric perspective to FIFA’s strategic planning.

Alex Morgan

The USWNT icon has proven advocacy skills—negotiating equal pay and improving club standards. Though inexperienced in governance, her star power and entrepreneurial acumen offer fresh leadership potential.

Conclusion

The next FIFA president must usher in an era of transparent governance, place sporting merit at the forefront and champion the growth of women’s soccer. By installing robust checks and balances, prioritizing the game itself and fostering responsible investment, FIFA can move beyond past controversies and deliver a vibrant, inclusive future for global football.

Leave a Comment